IJJ vs RSPA: how they differ

IJJ and RSPA hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and RSPA returned +12.6% over the year. iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF.

IJJ costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.1 points; IJJ is 7.0 times larger.

IJJRSPA
Expense ratio0.18%0.29%
Net assets$8.4bn$1.2bn
Total return, 1 year+10.5%+12.6%
Holdings in common0%
Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year+23.6%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund11.0%4.2%
Below its high7.1%, high on Aug 14, 20263.2%, high on Aug 26, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

+10.5%
IJJ total return, 1 year
+12.6%
RSPA total return, 1 year
0.18%
IJJ expense ratio
0.29%
RSPA expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IJJ and RSPA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IJJ RSPA
Only in IJJ
TD SYNNEX 1.30%
US FOODS HOLDING 1.27%
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM 1.23%
PERMIAN RESOURCES CLASS A 1.16%
HF SINCLAIR 1.13%
OVINTIV 1.06%
WESCO INTERNATIONAL 1.05%
REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA 1.01%
Only in RSPA
Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The 0.61%
Toronto-Dominion Bank/The 0.55%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce 0.43%
Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The 0.43%
Royal Bank of Canada 0.42%
Wells Fargo & Co 0.39%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 0.36%
Barclays Bank PLC 0.36%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IJJ
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
RSPA
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +10.5% +12.6%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −6.7 pts −4.7 pts
Expense ratio 0.18% 0.29%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 74.0%
Holdings 303 520
Net assets $8.4bn $1.2bn

IJJ and RSPA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

IJJ in plain words

IJJ tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +10.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 303 positions, with the top ten at 11.0%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

RSPA in plain words

RSPA is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +12.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 74% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 520 positions, with the top ten at 4.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Aug 26, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJJ or RSPA?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJJ returned +10.5% and RSPA +12.6%.
Which is cheaper, IJJ or RSPA?
IJJ is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $11. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJJ and RSPA overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJJ and 74% of RSPA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, IJJ against RSPA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ijj-vs-rspa

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.