FQAL vs IWB: Differences, Returns & Fees

FQAL and IWB hold 43% of their weight in the same names, and IWB returned +16.6% over the year. Net assets: $1.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Quality Factor ETF, and $49.6bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 ETF.

Both cost 0.15% a year; their one-year returns differ by 1.4 points; IWB is far larger, $48.6bn against $1.4bn.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

FQAL vs IWB: Differences, Returns & Fees
FQALIWB
Expense ratio0.15%0.15%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$1.4bn$48.6bn
Total return, 1 year+15.2%+16.6%
What it tracksFidelity U.S. Quality Factor IndexRussell 1000 Index
Holdings in common43%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund38.1%36.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+15.2%
FQAL total return, 1 year
+16.6%
IWB total return, 1 year
0.15%
FQAL expense ratio
0.15%
IWB expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FQAL and IWB hold 43% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

43% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding FQAL IWB
NVIDIA CORP 7.69% 7.44%
APPLE INC 7.22% 6.77%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.62% 5.53%
ALPHABET INC 5.58% 2.85%
BROADCOM INC 3.36% 2.34%
META PLATFORMS INC 1.90% 2.20%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.12% 0.97%
VISA INC 1.48% 0.91%
ABBVIE INC 1.14% 0.68%
MASTERCARD INC 1.23% 0.66%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.46% 0.65%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC 0.90% 0.65%
Only in FQAL
JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 1.97%
ELI LILLY and CO 1.77%
APPLIED MATERIALS INC 1.54%
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 1.42%
JOHNSON and JOHNSON 1.37%
MERCK and CO INC 0.94%
PROCTER and GAMBLE CO 0.75%
CHEVRON CORP NEW 0.72%
Only in IWB
AMAZON.COM INC 3.54%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.30%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.61%
TESLA INC 1.56%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.38%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.34%
ELI LILLY 1.31%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.24%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

FQAL
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks the Russell 1000
Total return, 1 year +15.2% +16.6%
Its benchmark over the same days not published +16.8% (VONE)
Gap to its benchmark not available −0.1 pts vs VONE
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 94.0% 91.7%
Holdings 124 1025
Net assets, FQAL as of Sep 30, 2026 and IWB as of Oct 9, 2026 $1.4bn $49.6bn

FQAL and IWB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About FQAL

FQAL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 124 positions, with the top ten at 38.1%.

About IWB

IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FQAL or IWB?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FQAL returned +15.2% and IWB +16.6%.
Which is cheaper, FQAL or IWB?
Neither: FQAL and IWB both charge 0.15% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FQAL and IWB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of FQAL and 92% of IWB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FQAL against IWB, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fqal-vs-iwb

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.