Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FQAL vs GSLC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FQAL returned +15.1% to GSLC's +13.3%; 49% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FQAL and GSLC

Net assets: $1.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Quality Factor ETF, and $15.3bn on Nov 3, 2026 for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF.

At a glance
+15.1%
FQAL total return, 1 year
+13.3%
GSLC total return, 1 year
0.15%
FQAL expense ratio
0.09%
GSLC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

GSLC costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.8 points.

FQAL vs GSLC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFQALGSLC
Return
Total return, 1 year+15.1%+13.3%
Benchmark
What it tracksFidelity U.S. Quality Factor IndexGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.09%
Net assets, FQAL as of Sep 30, 2026 and GSLC as of Nov 3, 2026$1.4bn$15.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common49%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund38.1%35.2%

Method

Risk and return

Sep 23, 2016 to Oct 30, 2026 · 527 weekly returns
FQAL GSLC
Return
Total return edge Tie +277.2% +282.8%
Annualized edge Tie +14.0% +14.2%
Price return edge GSLC (slight) +225.3% +230.4%
Risk
Volatility edge FQAL (slight) 16.5% 17.0%
Max drawdown edge FQAL (slight) −30.9% −31.8%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge Tie 0.73 0.72
Sortino edge Tie 1.05 1.04
Calmar edge Tie 0.45 0.45
Reading

From Sep 2016 to Oct 2026, FQAL and GSLC returned about the same: +277.2% and +282.8%. FQAL swung slightly less: 16.5% to 17.0%. FQAL fell slightly less at its worst: −30.9% to −31.8%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FQAL vs GSLC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFQALGSLCEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+277.2%+282.8%TiePrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+14.0%+14.2%TieTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+225.3%+230.4%GSLC (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility16.5%17.0%FQAL (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.4%11.8%FQAL (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−30.9%−31.8%FQAL (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.730.72TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.051.04TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.450.45TieAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 527 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

49%

By the books each fund has filed, FQAL and GSLC hold 49% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

49% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FQAL GSLC
NVIDIA CORP 7.69% 8.02%
APPLE INC 7.22% 6.96%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.62% 5.32%
ALPHABET INC 5.58% 2.87%
BROADCOM INC 3.36% 2.32%
META PLATFORMS INC 1.90% 1.86%
JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 1.97% 1.26%
ELI LILLY and CO 1.77% 1.22%
JOHNSON and JOHNSON 1.37% 0.85%
VISA INC 1.48% 0.78%
MASTERCARD INC 1.23% 0.68%
LAM RESEARCH CORP 1.31% 0.67%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FQAL
DOMINOS PIZZA INC 0.70%
S and P GLOBAL INC 0.66%
CULLEN/FROST BANKERS INC 0.64%
EAST WEST BANCORP INC 0.62%
MSCI INC 0.59%
COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC 0.59%
AXOS FINANCIAL INC 0.55%
PAYCHEX INC 0.48%
Only in GSLC
AMAZON.COM INC 3.52%
ALPHABET INC 1.79%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 1.24%
TESLA INC 1.03%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC 0.89%
WALMART INC 0.72%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 0.69%
ATLASSIAN CORP 0.56%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FQAL Fidelity Quality Factor ETF GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +15.1% +13.3%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +14.8% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −1.5 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.09%
Already in the S&P 500 94.0% 93.7%
Holdings 124 426
Net assets, FQAL as of Sep 30, 2026 and GSLC as of Nov 3, 2026 $1.4bn $15.3bn

FQAL and GSLC on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FQAL

FQAL tracks an index. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +15.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 124 positions, with the top ten at 38.1%.

GSLC

GSLC tracks an index. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +13.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 426 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FQAL or GSLC?
In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FQAL returned +15.1% and GSLC +13.3%.
Which is cheaper, FQAL or GSLC?
GSLC is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FQAL and GSLC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of FQAL and 94% of GSLC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FQAL against GSLC, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fqal-vs-gslc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.