FQAL vs SPYM: Differences, Returns & Fees
FQAL and SPYM hold 52% of their weight in the same names, and SPYM returned +17.3% over the year. Net assets: $1.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Quality Factor ETF, and $178.5bn on Oct 8, 2026 for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF.
SPYM costs 0.13 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.1 points; SPYM is far larger, $173.6bn against $1.4bn.
| FQAL | SPYM | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.02% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $1.4bn | $173.6bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +15.2% | +17.3% |
| What it tracks | not read by ETFIQ | S&P 500 Index ? |
| Holdings in common | 52% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 38.1% | 39.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FQAL and SPYM hold 52% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
half
52% in common
On the same fields
FQAL and SPYM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FQAL in plain words
FQAL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 124 positions, with the top ten at 38.1%.
SPYM in plain words
SPYM tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.02% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 506 positions, with the top ten at 39.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FQAL or SPYM?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FQAL returned +15.2% and SPYM +17.3%.
- Which is cheaper, FQAL or SPYM?
- SPYM is cheaper, by 0.13 percentage points a year. That is about $13 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FQAL against SPYM, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fqal-vs-spym
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). FQAL against SPYM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fqal-vs-spym
[FQAL against SPYM (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fqal-vs-spym)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.