LCTU vs SPYM: Differences, Returns & Fees
LCTU and SPYM hold 71% of their weight in the same names, and SPYM returned +17.3% over the year. Net assets: $1.2bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness Aware Active ETF, and $178.5bn on Oct 8, 2026 for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF.
SPYM costs 0.13 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.0 points; SPYM is far larger, $178.5bn against $1.2bn.
| LCTU | SPYM | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.02% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 | $1.2bn | $178.5bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +15.3% | +17.3% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | S&P 500 Index ? |
| Holdings in common | 71% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 35.2% | 39.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, LCTU and SPYM hold 71% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
71% in common
On the same fields
LCTU and SPYM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About LCTU
LCTU is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 322 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.
Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.3% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.
About SPYM
SPYM tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index ?. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.02% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 506 positions, with the top ten at 39.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, LCTU or SPYM?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LCTU returned +15.3% and SPYM +17.3%.
- Which is cheaper, LCTU or SPYM?
- SPYM is cheaper, by 0.13 percentage points a year. That is about $13 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, LCTU against SPYM, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/lctu-vs-spym
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). LCTU against SPYM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/lctu-vs-spym
[LCTU against SPYM (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/lctu-vs-spym)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.