Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FNDX vs MTUM: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNDX returned +23.9% to MTUM's +18.4%; 29% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FNDX and MTUM
Net assets: $27.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF, and $18.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF.
Pair scorecard
MTUM costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.5 points.
| Measure | FNDX | MTUM |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +23.9% | +18.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 11.9%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Fundamental U.S. Large Company | MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and MTUM as of Oct 27, 2026 | $27.6bn | $18.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 29% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 21.0% | 35.5% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and MTUM hold 29% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
29% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FNDX and MTUM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX and MTUM do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. FNDX follows Fundamental U.S. Large Company and MTUM follows MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index.
- Holdings in common. 29% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FNDX returned +23.9% and MTUM +18.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 5.5 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.
FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 731 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.
MTUM
MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 35.5%. It sat 11.9% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or MTUM?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +23.9% and MTUM +18.4%.
- Which is cheaper, FNDX or MTUM?
- MTUM is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FNDX against MTUM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-mtum
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FNDX against MTUM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-mtum
[FNDX against MTUM (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-mtum)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.