Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FNDX vs RDVY: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNDX returned +23.9% to RDVY's +17.6%; 22% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FNDX and RDVY
Net assets: $27.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF, and $25.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF.
Pair scorecard
FNDX costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.3 points.
| Measure | FNDX | RDVY |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +23.9% | +17.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 5.3%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Fundamental U.S. Large Company | Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.47% |
| Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and RDVY as of Oct 27, 2026 | $27.6bn | $25.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 22% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 21.0% | 22.1% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and RDVY hold 22% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
22% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FNDX and RDVY on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX and RDVY do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. FNDX follows Fundamental U.S. Large Company and RDVY follows Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index.
- Holdings in common. 22% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FNDX returned +23.9% and RDVY +17.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 6.3 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.
FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 731 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.
RDVY
RDVY tracks an index of Rising Dividend Achievers. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 72 positions, with the top ten at 22.1%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or RDVY?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +23.9% and RDVY +17.6%.
- Which is cheaper, FNDX or RDVY?
- FNDX is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FNDX against RDVY, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-rdvy
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FNDX against RDVY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-rdvy
[FNDX against RDVY (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-rdvy)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.