Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FNDX vs QUAL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNDX returned +23.9% to QUAL's +13.1%; 30% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FNDX and QUAL

Net assets: $27.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF, and $48.2bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF.

At a glance
+23.9%
FNDX total return, 1 year
+13.1%
QUAL total return, 1 year
0.25%
FNDX expense ratio
0.15%
QUAL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

QUAL costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.8 points.

FNDX vs QUAL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNDXQUAL
Return
Total return, 1 year+23.9%+13.1%
Benchmark
What it tracksFundamental U.S. Large CompanyMSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.25%0.15%
Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and QUAL as of Oct 28, 2026$27.6bn$48.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common30%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund21.0%44.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Aug 23, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 687 weekly returns
FNDX QUAL
Return
Total return edge QUAL (slight) +418.7% +443.7%
Annualized edge QUAL (slight) +13.3% +13.7%
Price return edge QUAL +298.9% +346.0%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 15.9% 16.2%
Max drawdown edge QUAL −35.2% −31.4%
Downside capture 92.1% 98.8%
Beta 0.93 0.97
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge Tie 0.74 0.75
Sortino edge QUAL (slight) 1.05 1.09
Treynor 0.128 0.126
Calmar edge QUAL 0.38 0.44
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.4% a year +0.6% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.28 0.59
Information ratio −0.10 0.06
Tracking error 5.3% 3.7%

Each against its own benchmark: FNDX against IWB, Aug 23, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; QUAL against MLRG, Jul 26, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

QUAL returned slightly more: +443.7% to +418.7%. FNDX and QUAL swung about the same: 15.9% and 16.2%. QUAL fell less at its worst: −31.4% to −35.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FNDX vs QUAL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNDXQUALEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+418.7%+443.7%QUAL (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+13.3%+13.7%QUAL (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+298.9%+346.0%QUALPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility15.9%16.2%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.2%11.2%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−35.2%−31.4%QUALDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture86.4%98.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture92.1%98.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.930.97Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.900.95Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.740.75TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.051.09QUAL (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1280.126Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.380.44QUALAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWBMLRGThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.4% a year+0.6% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.280.59Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.4% to +3.2%−1.4% to +2.6%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.100.06Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error5.3%3.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 687 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

30%

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and QUAL hold 30% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

30% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FNDX QUAL
Apple Inc 4.46% 7.38%
Microsoft Corp 2.82% 8.09%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 2.42% 2.50%
Alphabet Inc 1.78% 1.82%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.60% 1.94%
Alphabet Inc 1.41% 1.43%
Meta Platforms Inc 1.21% 4.06%
Johnson & Johnson 1.06% 2.14%
Walmart Inc 0.88% 1.04%
Merck & Co Inc 0.79% 1.34%
Procter & Gamble Co 0.70% 0.89%
NVIDIA Corp 0.63% 6.28%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FNDX
Amazon.com Inc 1.80%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.63%
Chevron Corp 1.61%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.45%
Intel Corp 1.42%
Bank of America Corp 1.01%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.01%
Micron Technology Inc 0.97%
Only in QUAL
TJX 3.50%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 2.39%
GARMIN 0.89%
ILLINOIS TOOL INC 0.74%
PROLOGIS REIT 0.73%
APPLOVIN CLASS A 0.49%
COMFORT SYSTEMS USA 0.45%
PUBLIC STORAGE REIT 0.31%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company Tracks the MSCI USA Quality Factor
Total return, 1 year +23.9% +13.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.1% (IWB) +13.6% (MLRG)
Gap to its benchmark +10.8 pts vs IWB −0.5 pts vs MLRG
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 88.4% 97.2%
Holdings 731 119
Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and QUAL as of Oct 28, 2026 $27.6bn $48.2bn

FNDX and QUAL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-8744129C81

FNDX and QUAL do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. FNDX follows Fundamental U.S. Large Company and QUAL follows MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 30% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FNDX returned +23.9% and QUAL +13.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 10.8 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

QUAL flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FNDX

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.

FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 731 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.

QUAL

QUAL tracks the MSCI USA Quality Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 119 positions, with the top ten at 44.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or QUAL?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +23.9% and QUAL +13.1%.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or QUAL?
QUAL is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and QUAL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of FNDX and 97% of QUAL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FNDX against QUAL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-qual

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.