Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FNDX vs SPMO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNDX returned +23.9% to SPMO's +18.4%; 32% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FNDX and SPMO

Net assets: $27.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF, and $22.3bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF.

At a glance
+23.9%
FNDX total return, 1 year
+18.4%
SPMO total return, 1 year
0.25%
FNDX expense ratio
0.13%
SPMO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SPMO costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.5 points.

FNDX vs SPMO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNDXSPMO
Return
Total return, 1 year+23.9%+18.4%
Drawdown
Below its high10.2%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksFundamental U.S. Large CompanyS&P 500 Momentum Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.25%0.13%
Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and SPMO as of Oct 27, 2026$27.6bn$22.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common32%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund21.0%50.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 23, 2015 to Oct 23, 2026 · 574 weekly returns
FNDX SPMO
Return
Total return edge SPMO +316.6% +519.8%
Annualized edge SPMO +13.8% +18.0%
Price return edge SPMO +232.2% +442.9%
Risk
Volatility edge FNDX 16.7% 19.0%
Max drawdown edge SPMO −35.2% −28.3%
Downside capture 92.1% 93.8%
Beta 0.93 0.98
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SPMO 0.72 0.84
Sortino edge SPMO 1.02 1.27
Treynor 0.128 0.164
Calmar edge SPMO 0.39 0.63
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.4% a year +3.8% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.28 1.28
Information ratio −0.10 0.36
Tracking error 5.3% 9.7%

Each against its own benchmark: FNDX against IWB, Aug 23, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; SPMO against VOO, Oct 23, 2015 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

SPMO returned more: +519.8% to +316.6%. FNDX swung less: 16.7% to 19.0%. SPMO fell less at its worst: −28.3% to −35.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FNDX vs SPMO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNDXSPMOEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+316.6%+519.8%SPMOPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+13.8%+18.0%SPMOTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+232.2%+442.9%SPMOPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility16.7%19.0%FNDXSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.8%12.6%FNDX (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−35.2%−28.3%SPMODeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture86.4%98.9%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture92.1%93.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.930.98Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.900.74Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.720.84SPMOReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.021.27SPMOReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1280.164Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.390.63SPMOAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWBVOOThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.4% a year+3.8% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.281.28Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.4% to +3.2%−2.0% to +9.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.100.36Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error5.3%9.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 574 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

32%

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and SPMO hold 32% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

32% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FNDX SPMO
Apple Inc 4.46% 9.95%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 2.42% 3.57%
Alphabet Inc 1.78% 4.76%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.45% 1.83%
Intel Corp 1.42% 4.60%
Alphabet Inc 1.41% 3.82%
Johnson & Johnson 1.06% 4.86%
Micron Technology Inc 0.97% 8.80%
Valero Energy Corp 0.91% 0.94%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 0.80% 0.81%
Merck & Co Inc 0.79% 2.22%
Citigroup Inc 0.78% 0.91%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FNDX
Microsoft Corp 2.82%
Amazon.com Inc 1.80%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.63%
Chevron Corp 1.61%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.60%
Meta Platforms Inc 1.21%
Bank of America Corp 1.01%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.01%
Only in SPMO
Lumentum Holdings Inc 0.89%
Comfort Systems USA Inc 0.29%
Coherent Corp 0.23%
EchoStar Corp 0.06%
Federal Realty Investment Trust 0.05%
Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 0.05%
SECURITIES LENDING - BNYM 0.00%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company Tracks the S&P 500 Momentum
Total return, 1 year +23.9% +18.4%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.1% (IWB) +13.7% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark +10.8 pts vs IWB +4.7 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.13%
Already in the S&P 500 88.4% 100.0%
Holdings 731 101
Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and SPMO as of Oct 27, 2026 $27.6bn $22.3bn

FNDX and SPMO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-36548B08CF

FNDX and SPMO do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. FNDX follows Fundamental U.S. Large Company and SPMO follows S&P 500 Momentum Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 32% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FNDX returned +23.9% and SPMO +18.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 5.5 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

SPMO flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FNDX

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.

FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 731 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.

SPMO

SPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 50.7%. It sat 10.2% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or SPMO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +23.9% and SPMO +18.4%.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or SPMO?
SPMO is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and SPMO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of FNDX and 100% of SPMO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FNDX against SPMO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-spmo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.