Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FNDX vs USMV: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNDX returned +23.9% to USMV's +10.8%; 31% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FNDX and USMV
Net assets: $27.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF, and $24.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF.
Pair scorecard
USMV costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 13.1 points.
| Measure | FNDX | USMV |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +23.9% | +10.8% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Fundamental U.S. Large Company | MSCI USA Minimum Volatility (USD) Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and USMV as of Oct 27, 2026 | $27.6bn | $24.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 31% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 21.0% | 14.8% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and USMV hold 31% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
31% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FNDX and USMV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX and USMV do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. FNDX follows Fundamental U.S. Large Company and USMV follows MSCI USA Minimum Volatility (USD) Index.
- Holdings in common. 31% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FNDX returned +23.9% and USMV +10.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 13.1 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.
FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 731 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.
USMV
USMV tracks the MSCI USA Min Vol Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +10.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 176 positions, with the top ten at 14.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or USMV?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +23.9% and USMV +10.8%.
- Which is cheaper, FNDX or USMV?
- USMV is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FNDX against USMV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-usmv
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FNDX against USMV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-usmv
[FNDX against USMV (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-usmv)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.