FLQM vs IJK: Differences, Returns & Fees
FLQM and IJK hold 14% of their weight in the same names, and IJK returned +14.9% over the year. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $1.5bn for Franklin U.S. Mid Cap Multifactor Index ETF and $10.5bn for iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF.
IJK costs 0.14 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.6 points; IJK is 7.1 times larger.
| FLQM | IJK | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.16% |
| Net assets | $1.5bn | $10.5bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +10.3% | +14.9% |
| What it tracks | not read by ETFIQ | S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index |
| Holdings in common | 14% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 11.3% | 13.5% |
| Below its high | 8.1%, high on Aug 17, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FLQM and IJK hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
14% in common
On the same fields
FLQM and IJK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About FLQM
FLQM tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +10.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 68% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 205 positions, with the top ten at 11.3%.
About IJK
IJK tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +14.9% with distributions reinvested, against +14.9% for its benchmark, the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.16% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 250 positions, with the top ten at 13.5%. It sat 8.1% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FLQM or IJK?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLQM returned +10.3% and IJK +14.9%.
- Which is cheaper, FLQM or IJK?
- IJK is cheaper, by 0.14 percentage points a year. That is about $14 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FLQM against IJK, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flqm-vs-ijk
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). FLQM against IJK. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flqm-vs-ijk
[FLQM against IJK (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flqm-vs-ijk)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.