FLQM vs VFLO: Differences, Returns & Fees
FLQM and VFLO hold 11% of their weight in the same names, and VFLO returned +47.4% over the year. Net assets: $1.5bn on Oct 20, 2026 for Franklin U.S. Mid Cap Multifactor Index ETF, and $7.8bn on Jun 30, 2026 for VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF.
FLQM costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 37.1 points; VFLO is 5.1 times larger.
| FLQM | VFLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.39% |
| Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026 | $1.5bn | $7.8bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +10.3% | +47.4% |
| What it tracks | not read by ETFIQ | Victory U.S. Large Cap Free Cash Flow Index |
| Holdings in common | 11% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 11.3% | 30.8% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
FLQM and VFLO are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. FLQM follows not read by ETFIQ and VFLO follows Victory U.S. Large Cap Free Cash Flow Index.
- Holdings in common. 11% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jun 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 FLQM returned +10.3% and VFLO +47.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 37.1 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FLQM and VFLO hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
half
11% in common
On the same fields
FLQM and VFLO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About FLQM
FLQM tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +10.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 68% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 205 positions, with the top ten at 11.3%.
About VFLO
VFLO tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +47.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 50 positions, with the top ten at 30.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FLQM or VFLO?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLQM returned +10.3% and VFLO +47.4%.
- Which is cheaper, FLQM or VFLO?
- FLQM is cheaper, by 0.09 percentage points a year. That is about $9 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FLQM against VFLO, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flqm-vs-vflo
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). FLQM against VFLO. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flqm-vs-vflo
[FLQM against VFLO (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flqm-vs-vflo)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.