FTC vs IJK: Differences, Returns & Fees
FTC and IJK hold 10% of their weight in the same names, and IJK returned +14.9% over the year. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $1.3bn for First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund and $10.5bn for iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF.
IJK costs 0.42 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.0 points; IJK is 8.0 times larger.
| FTC | IJK | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.58% | 0.16% |
| Net assets | $1.3bn | $10.5bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.9% | +14.9% |
| What it tracks | Nasdaq AlphaDEX Large Cap Growth Index | S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index |
| Holdings in common | 10% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 9.6% | 13.5% |
| Below its high | 10.5%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | 8.1%, high on Aug 17, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 19, 2026.
FTC and IJK are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. FTC follows Nasdaq AlphaDEX Large Cap Growth Index and IJK follows S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index.
- Holdings in common. 10% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 19, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 FTC returned +7.9% and IJK +14.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 7.0 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FTC and IJK hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 19, 2026.
half
10% in common
On the same fields
FTC and IJK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About FTC
FTC tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +7.9% with distributions reinvested, against +15.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.58% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 75% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 9.6%. It sat 10.5% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About IJK
IJK tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +14.9% with distributions reinvested, against +14.9% for its benchmark, the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.16% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 250 positions, with the top ten at 13.5%. It sat 8.1% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FTC or IJK?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTC returned +7.9% and IJK +14.9%.
- Which is cheaper, FTC or IJK?
- IJK is cheaper, by 0.42 percentage points a year. That is about $42 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FTC against IJK, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftc-vs-ijk
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). FTC against IJK. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftc-vs-ijk
[FTC against IJK (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftc-vs-ijk)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.