FLQM vs IWR: Differences, Returns & Fees
FLQM and IWR hold 26% of their weight in the same names, and IWR returned +15.1% over the year. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $1.5bn for Franklin U.S. Mid Cap Multifactor Index ETF and $57.0bn for iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF.
IWR costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.8 points; IWR is far larger, $57.0bn against $1.5bn.
| FLQM | IWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.18% |
| Net assets | $1.5bn | $57.0bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +10.3% | +15.1% |
| What it tracks | not read by ETFIQ | Russell Midcap Index |
| Holdings in common | 26% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 11.3% | 6.8% |
| Below its high | 4.3%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FLQM and IWR hold 26% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
26% in common
On the same fields
FLQM and IWR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About FLQM
FLQM tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +10.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 68% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 205 positions, with the top ten at 11.3%.
About IWR
IWR tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 62% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 825 positions, with the top ten at 6.8%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +15.1% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FLQM or IWR?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLQM returned +10.3% and IWR +15.1%.
- Which is cheaper, FLQM or IWR?
- IWR is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FLQM against IWR, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flqm-vs-iwr
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). FLQM against IWR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flqm-vs-iwr
[FLQM against IWR (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flqm-vs-iwr)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.