FTC vs IWR: Differences, Returns & Fees
FTC and IWR hold 24% of their weight in the same names, and IWR returned +15.1% over the year. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $1.3bn for First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund and $57.0bn for iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF.
IWR costs 0.40 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.2 points; IWR is far larger, $57.0bn against $1.3bn.
| FTC | IWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.58% | 0.18% |
| Net assets | $1.3bn | $57.0bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.9% | +15.1% |
| What it tracks | Nasdaq AlphaDEX Large Cap Growth Index | Russell Midcap Index |
| Holdings in common | 24% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 9.6% | 6.8% |
| Below its high | 10.5%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | 4.3%, high on Aug 14, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 19, 2026.
FTC and IWR are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. FTC follows Nasdaq AlphaDEX Large Cap Growth Index and IWR follows Russell Midcap Index.
- Holdings in common. 24% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 19, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 FTC returned +7.9% and IWR +15.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 7.2 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FTC and IWR hold 24% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 19, 2026.
half
24% in common
On the same fields
FTC and IWR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About FTC
FTC tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +7.9% with distributions reinvested, against +15.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.58% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 75% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 9.6%. It sat 10.5% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About IWR
IWR tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 62% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 825 positions, with the top ten at 6.8%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +15.1% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FTC or IWR?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTC returned +7.9% and IWR +15.1%.
- Which is cheaper, FTC or IWR?
- IWR is cheaper, by 0.40 percentage points a year. That is about $40 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FTC against IWR, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftc-vs-iwr
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). FTC against IWR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftc-vs-iwr
[FTC against IWR (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftc-vs-iwr)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.