FLDR vs JPST: Differences, Returns & Fees
On May 31, 2026 FLDR's duration was 0.8 years and JPST's 0.8; FLDR charges 0.15% to JPST's 0.18%. Net assets: $2.3bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF, and $42.8bn on Oct 20, 2026 for JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF.
FLDR costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points; JPST is far larger, $38.4bn against $1.6bn.
| FLDR | JPST | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.18% |
| Net assets, as of May 31, 2026 | $1.6bn | $38.4bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.2% | +3.4% |
| What it tracks | Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 5% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026.
FLDR and JPST are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. FLDR follows Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index and JPST follows No index, actively managed.
- Holdings in common. 5% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated May 31, 2026).
- Size. FLDR has $1.6bn in net assets and JPST $38.4bn (net assets, as of May 31, 2026); JPST is 24.0 times larger.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FLDR and JPST hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
half
5% in common
On the same fields
FLDR and JPST on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About FLDR
FLDR tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
About JPST
JPST is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FLDR or JPST?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLDR returned +3.2% and JPST +3.4%.
- Which is cheaper, FLDR or JPST?
- FLDR is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FLDR against JPST, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fldr-vs-jpst
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). FLDR against JPST. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fldr-vs-jpst
[FLDR against JPST (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fldr-vs-jpst)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.