FLDR vs VUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees
FLDR's duration was 0.8 years on May 31, 2026 and VUSB's 1.0 on Jun 30, 2026; VUSB charges 0.10% to FLDR's 0.15%. Net assets on Sep 30, 2026: $2.3bn for Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF and $9.9bn for Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF.
VUSB costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points; VUSB is 4.2 times larger.
| FLDR | VUSB | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.10% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $2.3bn | $9.9bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.2% | +3.4% |
| What it tracks | Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | report dates differ | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
FLDR and VUSB are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. FLDR follows Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index and VUSB follows No index, actively managed.
- Number of holdings. FLDR holds 352 positions and VUSB holds 1344.
- Size. FLDR has $2.3bn in net assets and VUSB $9.9bn (net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026); VUSB is 4.3 times larger.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
On the same fields
FLDR and VUSB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About FLDR
FLDR tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
About VUSB
VUSB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FLDR or VUSB?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLDR returned +3.2% and VUSB +3.4%.
- Which is cheaper, FLDR or VUSB?
- VUSB is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FLDR against VUSB, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fldr-vs-vusb
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). FLDR against VUSB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fldr-vs-vusb
[FLDR against VUSB (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fldr-vs-vusb)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.