BILZ vs JPST: Differences, Returns & Fees

BILZ's duration was 0.2 years on Jun 30, 2026 and JPST's 0.8 on May 31, 2026; BILZ charges 0.14% to JPST's 0.18%. Net assets: $1.0bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund, and $42.8bn on Oct 20, 2026 for JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about BILZ and JPST

Answers cite the figures on this page.

BILZ costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.3 points.

BILZ vs JPST: Differences, Returns & Fees
BILZJPST
Expense ratio0.14%0.18%
Net assets, BILZ as of Jun 30, 2026 and JPST as of Oct 20, 2026$1.0bn$42.8bn
Total return, 1 year+3.7%+3.4%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Holdings in commonreport dates differ

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

+3.7%
BILZ total return, 1 year
+3.4%
JPST total return, 1 year
0.14%
BILZ expense ratio
0.18%
JPST expense ratio

Get JPST's fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-A699122227

BILZ and JPST are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Size. BILZ has $1.0bn in net assets and JPST $42.8bn (net assets, BILZ as of Jun 30, 2026 and JPST as of Oct 20, 2026); JPST is 42.8 times larger.
  2. What each follows (similar). Both follow No index, actively managed.
  3. One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 BILZ returned +3.7% and JPST +3.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.3 points.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

On the same fields

BILZ
PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund
JPST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +3.7% +3.4%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured −1.9% (AGG)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +5.4 pts vs AGG
Expense ratio 0.14% 0.18%
Holdings not counted 824
Net assets, BILZ as of Jun 30, 2026 and JPST as of Oct 20, 2026 $1.0bn $42.8bn

BILZ and JPST on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About BILZ

BILZ is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.

About JPST

JPST is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BILZ or JPST?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BILZ returned +3.7% and JPST +3.4%.
Which is cheaper, BILZ or JPST?
BILZ is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BILZ against JPST, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bilz-vs-jpst

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.