Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EWY vs SCHF: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWY returned +79.7% to SCHF's +17.6%; 8% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EWY and SCHF

Net assets: $24.4bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF, and $69.7bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab International Equity ETF.

At a glance
+79.7%
EWY total return, 1 year
+17.6%
SCHF total return, 1 year
0.59%
EWY expense ratio
0.03%
SCHF expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHF costs 0.56 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 62.1 points.

EWY vs SCHF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWYSCHF
Return
Total return, 1 year+79.7%+17.6%
Drawdown
Below its high24.3%, high on Jun 18, 20264.4%, high on Aug 25, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Korea 25/50 Daily 25 Capped IndexFTSE Developed ex US Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.03%
Net assets, EWY as of Oct 28, 2026 and SCHF as of Aug 31, 2026$24.4bn$69.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common8%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund60.9%13.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 13, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026 · 884 weekly returns
EWY SCHF
Return
Total return edge EWY +338.6% +222.5%
Annualized edge EWY +9.1% +7.1%
Price return edge EWY +235.4% +106.8%
Risk
Volatility edge SCHF 26.3% 17.1%
Max drawdown edge SCHF −49.7% −33.8%
Downside capture 103.2% 99.0%
Beta 1.08 0.99
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge Tie 0.40 0.40
Sortino edge EWY (slight) 0.59 0.56
Treynor 0.124 0.069
Calmar edge SCHF 0.18 0.21
Against the benchmark
Alpha +2.5% a year +0.5% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.83 1.02
Information ratio 0.22 0.20
Tracking error 14.8% 1.9%

Each against its own benchmark: EWY against EEM, Apr 25, 2003 to Oct 23, 2026; SCHF against EFA, Nov 13, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

EWY returned more: +338.6% to +222.5%. SCHF swung less: 17.1% to 26.3%. SCHF fell less at its worst: −33.8% to −49.7%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: EWY vs SCHF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWYSCHFEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+338.6%+222.5%EWYPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+9.1%+7.1%EWYTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+235.4%+106.8%EWYPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility26.3%17.1%SCHFSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation18.1%12.1%SCHFLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−49.7%−33.8%SCHFDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture115.0%99.2%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture103.2%99.0%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.080.99Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.740.99Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.400.40TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.590.56EWY (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1240.069Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.180.21SCHFAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkEEMEFAThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+2.5% a year+0.5% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.831.02Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−3.4% to +8.5%−0.4% to +1.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.220.20Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error14.8%1.9%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 884 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

8%

By the books each fund has filed, EWY and SCHF hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

8% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EWY SCHF
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 23.14% 2.88%
SK HYNIX 23.11% 2.23%
SK SQUARE 2.78% 0.22%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS LTD 2.67% 0.19%
KB FINANCIAL GROUP 2.06% 0.14%
HYUNDAI MOTOR 1.51% 0.13%
SHINHAN FINANCIAL GROUP 1.54% 0.11%
DOOSAN ENERBILITY LTD 1.12% 0.09%
HANA FINANCIAL GROUP 1.39% 0.09%
HANWHA AEROSPACE LTD 1.11% 0.09%
SAMSUNG SDI LTD 1.38% 0.08%
NAVER 1.17% 0.08%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EWY
SAMSUNG LIFE LTD 1.01%
SAMSUNG FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE LT 0.97%
HD KOREA SHIPBUILDING & OFFSHORE E 0.59%
APR LTD 0.50%
SAM YANG FOODS INC 0.48%
HYUNDAI MOTOR S2 PREF 0.42%
HYUNDAI MOTOR S1 PREF 0.35%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 0.05%
Only in SCHF
ASML Holding NV 2.14%
HSBC Holdings PLC 1.17%
Roche Holding AG 1.00%
Royal Bank of Canada 0.94%
Novartis AG 0.94%
Shell PLC 0.83%
Nestle SA 0.83%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc 0.82%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI South Korea Tracks an index of International Equity
Total return, 1 year +79.7% +17.6%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.3% (EEM) +12.1% (EFA)
Gap to its benchmark +63.4 pts vs EEM +5.5 pts vs EFA
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.03%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 78 1475
Net assets, EWY as of Oct 28, 2026 and SCHF as of Aug 31, 2026 $24.4bn $69.7bn

EWY and SCHF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-14F66F0A85

EWY and SCHF do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. EWY follows MSCI Korea 25/50 Daily 25 Capped Index and SCHF follows FTSE Developed ex US Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 8% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EWY returned +79.7% and SCHF +17.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 62.1 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

EWY flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EWY

EWY tracks the MSCI South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 60.9%. It sat 24.3% below its high of Jun 18, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SCHF

SCHF tracks an index of International Equity. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +12.1% for its benchmark, the MSCI EAFE Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,475 positions, with the top ten at 13.8%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWY or SCHF?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWY returned +79.7% and SCHF +17.6%.
Which is cheaper, EWY or SCHF?
SCHF is cheaper, by 0.56 percentage points a year. That is about $56 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EWY and SCHF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWY and 0% of SCHF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EWY against SCHF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewy-vs-schf

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.