Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EWY vs IEFA: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWY returned +79.7% to IEFA's +12.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EWY and IEFA

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $24.4bn for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF and $190.4bn for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF.

At a glance
+79.7%
EWY total return, 1 year
+12.3%
IEFA total return, 1 year
0.59%
EWY expense ratio
0.07%
IEFA expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IEFA costs 0.52 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 67.4 points; IEFA is 7.8 times larger.

EWY vs IEFA: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWYIEFA
Return
Total return, 1 year+79.7%+12.3%
Drawdown
Below its high24.3%, high on Jun 18, 20264.7%, high on Aug 25, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Korea 25/50 Daily 25 Capped IndexMSCI EAFE IMI Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.07%
Net assets$24.4bn$190.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund60.9%12.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EWY and IEFA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EWY IEFA
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EWY
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 23.14%
SK HYNIX 23.11%
SK SQUARE 2.78%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS LTD 2.67%
KB FINANCIAL GROUP 2.06%
SHINHAN FINANCIAL GROUP 1.54%
HYUNDAI MOTOR 1.51%
HANA FINANCIAL GROUP 1.39%
Only in IEFA
ASML HOLDING 2.55%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.36%
SHELL 1.21%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.18%
NOVARTIS AG 1.14%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.04%
NESTLE SA 1.04%
SAP 0.97%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI South Korea Tracks the MSCI EAFE
Total return, 1 year +79.7% +12.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.3% (EEM) +14.3% (ACWX)
Gap to its benchmark +63.4 pts vs EEM −2.0 pts vs ACWX
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.07%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 78 2629
Net assets $24.4bn $190.4bn

EWY and IEFA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EWY and IEFA flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EWY

EWY tracks the MSCI South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 60.9%. It sat 24.3% below its high of Jun 18, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IEFA

IEFA tracks the MSCI EAFE. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,629 positions, with the top ten at 12.3%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWY or IEFA?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWY returned +79.7% and IEFA +12.3%.
Which is cheaper, EWY or IEFA?
IEFA is cheaper, by 0.52 percentage points a year. That is about $52 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EWY and IEFA overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWY and 0% of IEFA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EWY against IEFA, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewy-vs-iefa

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.