DUSB vs USFR: Differences, Returns & Fees

DUSB's duration was 0.9 years on Jul 31, 2026 and USFR's 0.0 on May 31, 2026; both charge 0.15%. Net assets: $2.2bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF, and $17.0bn on May 31, 2026 for WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about DUSB and USFR

Answers cite the figures on this page.

Both cost 0.15% a year; their one-year returns differ by 0.4 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

DUSB vs USFR: Differences, Returns & Fees
DUSBUSFR
Expense ratio0.15%0.15%
Net assets, DUSB as of Jul 31, 2026 and USFR as of May 31, 2026$2.2bn$17.0bn
Total return, 1 year+3.6%+4.0%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedBloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index
Holdings in commonreport dates differ

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

+3.6%
DUSB total return, 1 year
+4.0%
USFR total return, 1 year
0.15%
DUSB expense ratio
0.15%
USFR expense ratio

Get the week's ETF fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-599C9BE330

DUSB and USFR are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. DUSB follows No index, actively managed and USFR follows Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index.
  2. Number of holdings. DUSB holds 564 positions and USFR holds 4.
  3. Size. DUSB has $2.2bn in net assets and USFR $17.0bn (net assets, DUSB as of Jul 31, 2026 and USFR as of May 31, 2026); USFR is 7.7 times larger.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

On the same fields

DUSB
Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF
USFR
WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Floating Rate Treasury
Total return, 1 year +3.6% +4.0%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +4.0% (TFLO)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +0.1 pts vs TFLO
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.15%
Holdings 564 4
Net assets, DUSB as of Jul 31, 2026 and USFR as of May 31, 2026 $2.2bn $17.0bn

DUSB and USFR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About DUSB

DUSB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

About USFR

USFR tracks an index of Floating Rate Treasury. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested, against +4.0% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DUSB or USFR?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DUSB returned +3.6% and USFR +4.0%.
Which is cheaper, DUSB or USFR?
Neither: DUSB and USFR both charge 0.15% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DUSB against USFR, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dusb-vs-usfr

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.