DUSB vs SGOV: Differences, Returns & Fees
DUSB's duration was 0.9 years on Jul 31, 2026 and SGOV's 0.1 on May 31, 2026; SGOV charges 0.09% to DUSB's 0.15%. Net assets: $2.2bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF, and $116.5bn on Oct 20, 2026 for iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF.
SGOV costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points; SGOV is far larger, $99.9bn against $2.2bn.
| DUSB | SGOV | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.09% |
| Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026 | $2.2bn | $99.9bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.6% | +3.7% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index |
| Holdings in common | report dates differ | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
DUSB and SGOV are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. DUSB follows No index, actively managed and SGOV follows ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index.
- Number of holdings. DUSB holds 564 positions and SGOV holds 23.
- Size. DUSB has $2.2bn in net assets and SGOV $99.9bn (net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026); SGOV is 45.4 times larger.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
On the same fields
DUSB and SGOV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About DUSB
DUSB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
About SGOV
SGOV tracks an index of 0-3 month T-bills. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DUSB or SGOV?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DUSB returned +3.6% and SGOV +3.7%.
- Which is cheaper, DUSB or SGOV?
- SGOV is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DUSB against SGOV, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dusb-vs-sgov
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). DUSB against SGOV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dusb-vs-sgov
[DUSB against SGOV (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dusb-vs-sgov)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.