CGNG vs VWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
CGNG and VWO hold 14% of their weight in the same names, and CGNG returned +17.9% over the year. Net assets on Sep 30, 2026: $3.1bn for Capital Group New Geography Equity ETF and $125.4bn for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF.
VWO costs 0.58 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.8 points; VWO is far larger, $125.4bn against $3.1bn.
| CGNG | VWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.64% | 0.06% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $3.1bn | $125.4bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.9% | +12.1% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion Index |
| Holdings in common | 14% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 32.8% | 28.9% |
| Below its high | 4.2%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGNG and VWO hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
14% in common
On the same fields
CGNG and VWO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About CGNG
CGNG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.64% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 14% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 239 positions, with the top ten at 32.8%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
About VWO
VWO tracks an index of Emerging markets. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +12.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Aug 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 6,356 positions, with the top ten at 28.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGNG or VWO?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGNG returned +17.9% and VWO +12.1%.
- Which is cheaper, CGNG or VWO?
- VWO is cheaper, by 0.58 percentage points a year. That is about $58 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGNG against VWO, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgng-vs-vwo
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). CGNG against VWO. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgng-vs-vwo
[CGNG against VWO (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgng-vs-vwo)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.