CGNG vs EMOP: Differences, Returns & Fees
CGNG and EMOP hold 7% of their weight in the same names, and EMOP returned +31.0% over the year. Net assets: $3.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Capital Group New Geography Equity ETF, and $2.1bn on Oct 8, 2026 for AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF.
CGNG costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 13.1 points; CGNG is 1.5 times larger.
| CGNG | EMOP | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.64% | 0.70% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 | $3.2bn | $2.1bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.9% | +31.0% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 7% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 32.8% | 55.5% |
| Below its high | 4.2%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | 5.2%, high on Jun 22, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGNG and EMOP hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
half
7% in common
On the same fields
CGNG and EMOP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About CGNG
CGNG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.64% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 14% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 239 positions, with the top ten at 32.8%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
About EMOP
EMOP is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +26.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.70% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 2% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 56 positions, with the top ten at 55.5%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGNG or EMOP?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGNG returned +17.9% and EMOP +31.0%.
- Which is cheaper, CGNG or EMOP?
- CGNG is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGNG against EMOP, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgng-vs-emop
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). CGNG against EMOP. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgng-vs-emop
[CGNG against EMOP (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgng-vs-emop)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.