CGIC vs SPDW: Differences, Returns & Fees
CGIC and SPDW hold 29% of their weight in the same names, and SPDW returned +19.7% over the year. Net assets on Oct 8, 2026: $2.6bn for Capital Group International Core Equity ETF and $40.5bn for State Street SPDR Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF.
SPDW costs 0.51 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.9 points; SPDW is 15.8 times larger.
| CGIC | SPDW | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.54% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 | $2.6bn | $40.5bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.8% | +19.7% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index ? |
| Holdings in common | 29% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 26.0% | 12.9% |
| Below its high | 3.8%, high on Aug 25, 2026 | 4.5%, high on Sep 4, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGIC and SPDW hold 29% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
half
29% in common
On the same fields
CGIC and SPDW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGIC in plain words
CGIC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 2% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 26.0%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
SPDW in plain words
SPDW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,448 positions, with the top ten at 12.9%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Sep 4, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGIC or SPDW?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGIC returned +17.8% and SPDW +19.7%.
- Which is cheaper, CGIC or SPDW?
- SPDW is cheaper, by 0.51 percentage points a year. That is about $51 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGIC against SPDW, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgic-vs-spdw
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). CGIC against SPDW. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgic-vs-spdw
[CGIC against SPDW (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgic-vs-spdw)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.