CGIC vs CORO: Differences, Returns & Fees

CGIC and CORO hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and CORO returned +22.5% over the year. Net assets: $2.6bn on Oct 8, 2026 for Capital Group International Core Equity ETF, and $13.1bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares International Country Rotation Active ETF.

CGIC costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.7 points; CORO is 5.1 times larger.

CGICCORO
Expense ratio0.54%0.55%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026$2.6bn$13.0bn
Total return, 1 year+17.8%+22.5%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common5%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund26.0%77.4%
Below its high3.8%, high on Aug 25, 20263.6%, high on Sep 4, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+17.8%
CGIC total return, 1 year
+22.5%
CORO total return, 1 year
0.54%
CGIC expense ratio
0.55%
CORO expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGIC and CORO hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

5% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CGIC CORO
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 5.83% 4.85%
Only in CGIC
Capital Group Central Cash Fund 2.98%
MediaTek Inc 2.83%
ASML Holding NV 2.74%
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 2.46%
SK hynix Inc 2.25%
TotalEnergies SE 2.01%
AstraZeneca PLC 1.83%
BAE Systems PLC 1.71%
Only in CORO
ISHARES MSCI JAPAN ETF 19.62%
ISHARES MSCI CANADA ETF 13.40%
ISHARES MSCI SWITZERLAND ETF 8.76%
ISHARES MSCI SOUTH KOREA ETF 6.16%
ISHARES MSCI TAIWAN CAP ETF 6.07%
ISHARES MSCI SWEDEN ETF 5.23%
ISHARES MSCI UNITED KINGDOM ETF 5.22%
ISHARES MSCI HONG KONG ETF 4.12%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

CGIC
Capital Group International Core Equity ETF
CORO
iShares International Country Rotation Active ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +17.8% +22.5%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +0.5 pts +5.2 pts
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.55%
Already in the S&P 500 2.5% 0.0%
Holdings 192 27
Net assets, CGIC as of Oct 8, 2026 and CORO as of Oct 9, 2026 $2.6bn $13.1bn

CGIC and CORO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CGIC in plain words

CGIC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 2% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 26.0%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

CORO in plain words

CORO is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +22.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 27 positions, with the top ten at 77.4%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Sep 4, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGIC or CORO?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGIC returned +17.8% and CORO +22.5%.
Which is cheaper, CGIC or CORO?
CGIC is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGIC and CORO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 2% of CGIC and 0% of CORO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGIC against CORO, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgic-vs-coro

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.