CGIC vs IQLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
CGIC and IQLT hold 21% of their weight in the same names, and CGIC returned +17.8% over the year. Net assets: $2.6bn on Oct 8, 2026 for Capital Group International Core Equity ETF, and $13.6bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF.
IQLT costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.0 points.
| CGIC | IQLT | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.54% | 0.30% |
| Net assets, CGIC as of Oct 8, 2026 and IQLT as of Oct 9, 2026 | $2.6bn | $13.6bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.8% | +14.8% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | not read by ETFIQ |
| Holdings in common | 21% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 26.0% | 23.7% |
| Below its high | 3.8%, high on Aug 25, 2026 | 4.8%, high on Aug 25, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGIC and IQLT hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
21% in common
On the same fields
CGIC and IQLT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGIC in plain words
CGIC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 2% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 26.0%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
IQLT in plain words
IQLT tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 294 positions, with the top ten at 23.7%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGIC or IQLT?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGIC returned +17.8% and IQLT +14.8%.
- Which is cheaper, CGIC or IQLT?
- IQLT is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGIC against IQLT, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgic-vs-iqlt
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). CGIC against IQLT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgic-vs-iqlt
[CGIC against IQLT (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgic-vs-iqlt)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.