Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGGR vs LCAP: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to LCAP's +13.0%; 35% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGGR and LCAP
Net assets: $25.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Growth ETF, and $1.9bn on Oct 26, 2026 for Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF.
Pair scorecard
LCAP costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.4 points; CGGR is 13.6 times larger.
| Measure | CGGR | LCAP |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +2.6% | +13.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.29% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $25.9bn | $1.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 35% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 39.7% | 42.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and LCAP hold 35% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
35% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGGR and LCAP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGR and LCAP are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Holdings in common. 35% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGGR returned +2.6% and LCAP +13.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 10.4 points.
- Cost. CGGR charges 0.39% of assets a year and LCAP 0.29%, a gap of 0.10 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CGGR
CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.0% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.
LCAP is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 54 positions, with the top ten at 42.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or LCAP?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and LCAP +13.0%.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or LCAP?
- LCAP is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGGR against LCAP, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-lcap
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGGR against LCAP. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-lcap
[CGGR against LCAP (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-lcap)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.