CGDV vs USMC: Differences, Returns & Fees

CGDV and USMC hold 37% of their weight in the same names, and CGDV returned +18.5% over the year. Net assets on Oct 8, 2026: $38.9bn for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and $5.2bn for Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF.

USMC costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.7 points; CGDV is 7.5 times larger.

CGDV vs USMC: Differences, Returns & Fees
CGDVUSMC
Expense ratio0.33%0.12%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026$38.9bn$5.2bn
Total return, 1 year+18.5%+14.8%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common37%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund38.7%54.3%
Below its high3.4%, high on Aug 13, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

+18.5%
CGDV total return, 1 year
+14.8%
USMC total return, 1 year
0.33%
CGDV expense ratio
0.12%
USMC expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and USMC hold 37% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

half

37% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CGDV USMC
NVIDIA Corp 5.66% 7.54%
Broadcom Inc 5.16% 4.77%
Microsoft Corp 5.81% 4.30%
Alphabet Inc 3.59% 5.80%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.33% 3.51%
General Electric Co 3.08% 3.41%
Eli Lilly & Co 3.15% 2.52%
Apple Inc 2.36% 6.63%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.89% 4.40%
Amazon.com Inc 1.88% 3.60%
AbbVie Inc 1.35% 3.39%
Exxon Mobil Corp 1.34% 1.99%
Only in CGDV
Applied Materials Inc 3.12%
Cisco Systems Inc 3.02%
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 2.83%
RTX Corp 2.82%
British American Tobacco PLC 2.66%
Carrier Global Corp 2.64%
Starbucks Corp 2.26%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 2.16%
Only in USMC
Micron Technology Inc 8.75%
Visa Inc 4.33%
Costco Wholesale Corp 3.74%
Bank of America Corp 3.58%
Johnson & Johnson 3.20%
Caterpillar Inc 3.17%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 3.10%
Netflix Inc 3.00%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
USMC
Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +18.5% +14.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +26.4% (IWD) +17.3% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark −7.9 pts vs IWD −2.5 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.33% 0.12%
Already in the S&P 500 91.0% 99.8%
Holdings 53 26
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 $38.9bn $5.2bn

CGDV and USMC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About CGDV

CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +18.5% with distributions reinvested, against +26.4% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

About USMC

USMC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.12% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 26 positions, with the top ten at 54.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or USMC?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.5% and USMC +14.8%.
Which is cheaper, CGDV or USMC?
USMC is cheaper, by 0.21 percentage points a year. That is about $21 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGDV and USMC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of CGDV and 100% of USMC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGDV against USMC, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-usmc

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.