CGDV vs JPEF: Differences, Returns & Fees

CGDV and JPEF hold 24% of their weight in the same names, and CGDV returned +21.5% over the year. Net assets: $39.2bn on Oct 9, 2026 for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF, and $2.1bn on Oct 12, 2026 for JPMorgan Equity Focus ETF.

CGDV costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.3 points; CGDV is 19.0 times larger.

CGDV vs JPEF: Differences, Returns & Fees
CGDVJPEF
Expense ratio0.33%0.44%
Net assets, as of Oct 9, 2026$39.2bn$2.1bn
Total return, 1 year+21.5%+15.2%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common24%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund38.7%45.6%
Below its high3.3%, high on Aug 13, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+21.5%
CGDV total return, 1 year
+15.2%
JPEF total return, 1 year
0.33%
CGDV expense ratio
0.44%
JPEF expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and JPEF hold 24% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

24% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CGDV JPEF
NVIDIA Corp 5.66% 9.40%
Microsoft Corp 5.81% 5.14%
Broadcom Inc 5.16% 2.82%
Apple Inc 2.36% 5.61%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.33% 2.12%
Amazon.com Inc 1.88% 4.62%
RTX Corp 2.82% 1.70%
NextEra Energy Inc 1.02% 2.21%
McDonald's Corp 0.93% 1.23%
Only in CGDV
Alphabet Inc 3.59%
Eli Lilly & Co 3.15%
Applied Materials Inc 3.12%
General Electric Co 3.08%
Cisco Systems Inc 3.02%
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 2.83%
British American Tobacco PLC 2.66%
Carrier Global Corp 2.64%
Only in JPEF
ALPHABET INC-CL C 6.31%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.12%
ANALOG DEVICES INC 3.08%
MORGAN STANLEY DEAN 2.75%
UNITED RENTALS INC 2.73%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 2.66%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.60%
GILEAD SCIENCES INC 2.53%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
JPEF
JPMorgan Equity Focus ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +21.5% +15.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +29.7% (IWD) +20.5% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark −8.1 pts vs IWD −5.3 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.33% 0.44%
Already in the S&P 500 91.0% 93.7%
Holdings 53 40
Net assets, CGDV as of Oct 9, 2026 and JPEF as of Oct 12, 2026 $39.2bn $2.1bn

CGDV and JPEF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About CGDV

CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.7%. It sat 3.3% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 12, 2026.

Over the year to Oct 12, 2026 it returned +21.5% with distributions reinvested, against +29.7% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

About JPEF

JPEF is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 12, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +20.5% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.44% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 40 positions, with the top ten at 45.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or JPEF?
In the year to Oct 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +21.5% and JPEF +15.2%.
Which is cheaper, CGDV or JPEF?
CGDV is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGDV and JPEF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of CGDV and 94% of JPEF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGDV against JPEF, data as of Oct 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-jpef

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.