CATH vs QUAL: Differences, Returns & Fees
CATH and QUAL hold 43% of their weight in the same names, and QUAL returned +17.1% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $1.4bn for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF and $49.0bn for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF.
QUAL costs 0.14 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.6 points; QUAL is far larger, $49.0bn against $1.4bn.
| CATH | QUAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.29% | 0.15% |
| Net assets | $1.4bn | $49.0bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.5% | +17.1% |
| What it tracks | S&P 500 Catholic Values Index | MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index ? |
| Holdings in common | 43% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 40.6% | 45.8% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CATH and QUAL hold 43% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
43% in common
On the same fields
CATH and QUAL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CATH in plain words
CATH tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 444 positions, with the top ten at 40.6%.
QUAL in plain words
QUAL tracks the MSCI USA Quality Factor. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 119 positions, with the top ten at 45.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CATH or QUAL?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CATH returned +14.5% and QUAL +17.1%.
- Which is cheaper, CATH or QUAL?
- QUAL is cheaper, by 0.14 percentage points a year. That is about $14 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CATH against QUAL, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cath-vs-qual
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). CATH against QUAL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cath-vs-qual
[CATH against QUAL (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cath-vs-qual)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.