CATH vs USMV: Differences, Returns & Fees
CATH and USMV hold 31% of their weight in the same names, and CATH returned +14.5% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $1.4bn for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF and $23.8bn for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF.
USMV costs 0.14 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.0 points; USMV is 17.1 times larger.
| CATH | USMV | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.29% | 0.15% |
| Net assets | $1.4bn | $23.8bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.5% | +7.5% |
| What it tracks | S&P 500 Catholic Values Index | MSCI USA Minimum Volatility (USD) Index |
| Holdings in common | 31% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 40.6% | 15.1% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CATH and USMV hold 31% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
half
31% in common
On the same fields
CATH and USMV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About CATH
CATH tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 444 positions, with the top ten at 40.6%.
About USMV
USMV tracks the MSCI USA Min Vol Factor. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +7.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 176 positions, with the top ten at 15.1%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CATH or USMV?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CATH returned +14.5% and USMV +7.5%.
- Which is cheaper, CATH or USMV?
- USMV is cheaper, by 0.14 percentage points a year. That is about $14 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CATH against USMV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cath-vs-usmv
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). CATH against USMV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cath-vs-usmv
[CATH against USMV (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cath-vs-usmv)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.