CATH vs IVV: Differences, Returns & Fees
CATH and IVV hold 87% of their weight in the same names, and IVV returned +17.3% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $1.4bn for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF and $896.4bn for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF.
IVV costs 0.26 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.8 points; IVV is far larger, $896.4bn against $1.4bn.
| CATH | IVV | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.29% | 0.03% |
| Net assets | $1.4bn | $896.4bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.5% | +17.3% |
| What it tracks | S&P 500 Catholic Values Index | S&P 500 |
| Holdings in common | 87% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 40.6% | 39.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CATH and IVV hold 87% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
half
87% in common
On the same fields
CATH and IVV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About CATH
CATH tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 444 positions, with the top ten at 40.6%.
About IVV
IVV tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for its benchmark, the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 505 positions, with the top ten at 39.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CATH or IVV?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CATH returned +14.5% and IVV +17.3%.
- Which is cheaper, CATH or IVV?
- IVV is cheaper, by 0.26 percentage points a year. That is about $26 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CATH against IVV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cath-vs-ivv
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). CATH against IVV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cath-vs-ivv
[CATH against IVV (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cath-vs-ivv)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.