Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGGR vs IVV: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to IVV's +13.7%; 39% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGGR and IVV
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $25.9bn for Capital Group Growth ETF and $885.1bn for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF.
Pair scorecard
IVV costs 0.36 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.1 points; IVV is far larger, $885.1bn against $25.9bn.
| Measure | CGGR | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +2.6% | +13.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | S&P 500 |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $25.9bn | $885.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 39% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 39.7% | 38.1% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 242 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: CGGR against VOO, Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026; IVV against SPY, May 26, 2000 to Oct 23, 2026.
CGGR returned slightly more: +91.6% to +88.0%. IVV swung less: 16.3% to 20.4%. IVV fell less at its worst: −20.5% to −27.7%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | CGGR | IVV | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +91.6% | +88.0% | CGGR (slight) | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +15.0% | +14.5% | CGGR (slight) | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +89.2% | +75.9% | CGGR | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 20.4% | 16.3% | IVV | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 13.5% | 10.8% | IVV | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −27.7% | −20.5% | IVV | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 137.1% | 99.3% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 115.9% | 99.7% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 1.20 | 0.99 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.92 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.58 | 0.65 | IVV | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.88 | 0.99 | IVV | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.098 | 0.081 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.54 | 0.71 | IVV | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | VOO | SPY | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | −1.0% a year | +0.1% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | −0.37 | 0.33 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −6.3% to +4.3% | −0.4% to +0.5% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | 0.18 | 0.00 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 6.7% | 1.2% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 242 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and IVV hold 39% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
39% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGGR and IVV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGR and IVV are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. CGGR follows No index, actively managed and IVV follows S&P 500.
- Holdings in common. 39% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGGR returned +2.6% and IVV +13.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 11.1 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CGGR
CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
IVV
IVV tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 505 positions, with the top ten at 38.1%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or IVV?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and IVV +13.7%.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or IVV?
- IVV is cheaper, by 0.36 percentage points a year. That is about $36 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGGR against IVV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-ivv
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGGR against IVV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-ivv
[CGGR against IVV (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-ivv)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.