CATH vs DGRW: Differences, Returns & Fees
CATH and DGRW hold 48% of their weight in the same names, and CATH returned +14.5% over the year. Net assets: $1.4bn on Oct 9, 2026 for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF, and $16.6bn on Jun 30, 2026 for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund.
DGRW costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.6 points.
| CATH | DGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.29% | 0.28% |
| Net assets, CATH as of Oct 9, 2026 and DGRW as of Jun 30, 2026 | $1.4bn | $16.6bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.5% | +12.9% |
| What it tracks | S&P 500 Catholic Values Index | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index |
| Holdings in common | 48% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 40.6% | 36.1% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CATH and DGRW hold 48% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
48% in common
On the same fields
CATH and DGRW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About CATH
CATH tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 444 positions, with the top ten at 40.6%.
About DGRW
DGRW tracks an index of U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CATH or DGRW?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CATH returned +14.5% and DGRW +12.9%.
- Which is cheaper, CATH or DGRW?
- DGRW is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CATH against DGRW, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cath-vs-dgrw
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). CATH against DGRW. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cath-vs-dgrw
[CATH against DGRW (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cath-vs-dgrw)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.