Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BOND vs VT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOND returned −1.4% to VT's +13.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BOND and VT

Net assets: $8.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund, and $81.8bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total World Stock Index ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
BOND total return, 1 year
+13.5%
VT total return, 1 year
0.54%
BOND expense ratio
0.06%
VT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VT costs 0.48 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.9 points.

BOND vs VT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDVT
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+13.5%
Drawdown
Below its high3.1%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedFTSE Global All Cap Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.54%0.06%
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and VT as of Sep 30, 2026$8.3bn$81.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight55%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund22.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 9, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026 · 763 weekly returns
BOND VT
Return
Total return edge VT +47.4% +350.7%
Annualized edge VT +2.7% +10.8%
Price return edge VT −12.6% +227.5%
Risk
Volatility edge BOND 4.9% 15.4%
Max drawdown edge BOND −19.5% −32.6%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VT 0.21 0.63
Sortino edge VT 0.28 0.90
Calmar edge VT 0.14 0.33
Reading

VT returned more: +350.7% to +47.4%. BOND swung less: 4.9% to 15.4%. BOND fell less at its worst: −19.5% to −32.6%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: BOND vs VT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDVTEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+47.4%+350.7%VTPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+2.7%+10.8%VTTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−12.6%+227.5%VTPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility4.9%15.4%BONDSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation3.6%10.8%BONDLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−19.5%−32.6%BONDDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.210.63VTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.280.90VTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.140.33VTAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 763 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and VT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BOND VT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BOND
UMBS, TBA 5.56%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund 4.07%
UMBS, TBA 3.46%
United States Treasury 3.40%
UMBS, TBA 2.73%
United States Treasury 2.57%
UMBS, TBA 2.54%
UMBS, TBA 2.27%
Only in VT
NVIDIA Corp 4.54%
Apple Inc 4.11%
Microsoft Corp 3.25%
Amazon.com Inc 2.06%
Alphabet Inc 1.73%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 1.62%
Broadcom Inc 1.39%
Meta Platforms Inc 1.36%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund VT Vanguard Total World Stock Index ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Total World Stock
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +13.5%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) not measured
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs AGG not measured
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.06%
Holdings 1565 10194
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and VT as of Sep 30, 2026 $8.3bn $81.8bn

BOND and VT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-67F5DCB308

BOND and VT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. BOND follows No index, actively managed and VT follows FTSE Global All Cap Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 BOND returned −1.4% and VT +13.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 14.9 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BOND

BOND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VT

VT tracks an index of Total World Stock. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10,194 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or VT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −1.4% and VT +13.5%.
Which is cheaper, BOND or VT?
VT is cheaper, by 0.48 percentage points a year. That is about $48 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BOND against VT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-vt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.