Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

ACWI vs BOND: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ACWI returned +13.4% to BOND's −1.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ACWI and BOND

Net assets: $33.0bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF, and $8.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund.

At a glance
+13.4%
ACWI total return, 1 year
−1.4%
BOND total return, 1 year
0.32%
ACWI expense ratio
0.54%
BOND expense ratio

Pair scorecard

ACWI costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.8 points.

ACWI vs BOND: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureACWIBOND
Return
Total return, 1 year+13.4%−1.4%
Drawdown
Below its high3.1%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI ACWINo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.32%0.54%
Net assets, ACWI as of Oct 28, 2026 and BOND as of Jun 30, 2026$33.0bn$8.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight61%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund24.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and BOND hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first ACWI BOND
Only in one fund ↓
Only in ACWI
APPLE 4.97%
NVIDIA 4.89%
MICROSOFT 3.66%
AMAZON.COM INC 2.39%
ALPHABET CLASS A 1.83%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 1.77%
BROADCOM INC 1.51%
ALPHABET CLASS C 1.44%
Only in BOND
UMBS, TBA 5.56%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund 4.07%
UMBS, TBA 3.46%
United States Treasury 3.40%
UMBS, TBA 2.73%
United States Treasury 2.57%
UMBS, TBA 2.54%
UMBS, TBA 2.27%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
Issuer iShares PIMCO
What it is Tracks the MSCI ACWI Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +13.4% −1.4%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured −1.4% (AGG)
Gap to its benchmark not measured 0.0 pts vs AGG
Expense ratio 0.32% 0.54%
Holdings 2197 1565
Net assets, ACWI as of Oct 28, 2026 and BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 $33.0bn $8.3bn

ACWI and BOND on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

ACWI flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ACWI

ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,197 positions, with the top ten at 24.9%.

BOND

BOND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or BOND?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +13.4% and BOND −1.4%.
Which is cheaper, ACWI or BOND?
ACWI is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ACWI against BOND, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-bond

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.