Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BOND vs URTH: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOND returned −1.4% to URTH's +13.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BOND and URTH

Net assets: $8.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund, and $8.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI World ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
BOND total return, 1 year
+13.1%
URTH total return, 1 year
0.54%
BOND expense ratio
0.24%
URTH expense ratio

Pair scorecard

URTH costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.5 points.

BOND vs URTH: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDURTH
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+13.1%
Drawdown
Below its high3.1%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMSCI World Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.54%0.24%
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and URTH as of Oct 28, 2026$8.3bn$8.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight69%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund27.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and URTH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BOND URTH
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BOND
UMBS, TBA 5.56%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund 4.07%
UMBS, TBA 3.46%
United States Treasury 3.40%
UMBS, TBA 2.73%
United States Treasury 2.57%
UMBS, TBA 2.54%
UMBS, TBA 2.27%
Only in URTH
APPLE 5.60%
NVIDIA 5.50%
MICROSOFT 4.12%
AMAZON.COM INC 2.69%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.07%
BROADCOM INC 1.70%
ALPHABET CLASS C 1.62%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.49%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund URTH iShares MSCI World ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
Issuer PIMCO iShares
What it is Actively managed Tracks the MSCI World
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +13.1%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) +13.4% (ACWI)
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs AGG −0.3 pts vs ACWI
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.24%
Holdings 1565 1254
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and URTH as of Oct 28, 2026 $8.3bn $8.9bn

BOND and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

URTH flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BOND

BOND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

URTH

URTH tracks the MSCI World. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 69% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,254 positions, with the top ten at 27.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or URTH?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −1.4% and URTH +13.1%.
Which is cheaper, BOND or URTH?
URTH is cheaper, by 0.30 percentage points a year. That is about $30 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BOND against URTH, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-urth

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.