Which returned more over the last year, BOND or EWJ?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −0.1% and EWJ returned +26.5%, so EWJ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BOND or EWJ?

BOND charges 0.54% a year and EWJ charges 0.49%, so EWJ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BOND vs EWJ: how they differ

BOND and EWJ hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EWJ returned more over the year.

PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund and iShares MSCI Japan ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and EWJ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BOND	Only in EWJ
UMBS, TBA 4.80%	MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 4.70%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active 3.52%	TOYOTA MOTOR 3.41%
UMBS, TBA 2.98%	SOFTBANK GROUP 3.04%
United States Treasury 2.93%	SUMITOMO MITSUI FINANCIAL GROUP 3.01%
UMBS, TBA 2.36%	ADVANTEST 2.98%
United States Treasury 2.22%	TOKYO ELECTRON 2.82%
UMBS, TBA 2.19%	HITACHI 2.75%
UMBS, TBA 1.96%	KIOXIA HOLDINGS 2.68%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

BOND and EWJ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund	EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	PIMCO	iShares
What it is	Active Bond Exchange-Traded	MSCI Japan
Total return, 1 year	−0.1%	+26.5%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−17.6 pts	+9.0 pts
Expense ratio	0.54%	0.49%
Holdings	1565	171

BOND in plain words

BOND is a bond fund tracking the Active Bond Exchange-Traded. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

EWJ in plain words

EWJ is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Japan. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 171 positions, with the top ten at 30.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or EWJ?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −0.1% and EWJ returned +26.5%, so EWJ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BOND or EWJ?: BOND charges 0.54% a year and EWJ charges 0.49%, so EWJ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BOND against EWJ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BOND against EWJ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-ewj Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources