Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BOND vs EWJ: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOND returned −1.4% to EWJ's +18.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BOND and EWJ

Net assets: $8.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund, and $23.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI Japan ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
BOND total return, 1 year
+18.1%
EWJ total return, 1 year
0.54%
BOND expense ratio
0.49%
EWJ expense ratio

Pair scorecard

EWJ costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 19.5 points.

BOND vs EWJ: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDEWJ
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+18.1%
Drawdown
Below its high3.1%, high on Feb 27, 20264.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMSCI Japan Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.54%0.49%
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and EWJ as of Oct 28, 2026$8.3bn$23.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund29.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and EWJ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BOND EWJ
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BOND
UMBS, TBA 5.56%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund 4.07%
UMBS, TBA 3.46%
United States Treasury 3.40%
UMBS, TBA 2.73%
United States Treasury 2.57%
UMBS, TBA 2.54%
UMBS, TBA 2.27%
Only in EWJ
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 4.40%
TOYOTA MOTOR 3.59%
ADVANTEST 3.03%
HITACHI 3.03%
RECRUIT HOLDINGS LTD 3.03%
SONY GROUP 2.89%
SUMITOMO MITSUI FINANCIAL GROUP 2.83%
TOKYO ELECTRON 2.55%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
Issuer PIMCO iShares
What it is Actively managed Tracks the MSCI Japan
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +18.1%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) +14.3% (ACWX)
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs AGG +3.8 pts vs ACWX
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.49%
Holdings 1565 169
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and EWJ as of Oct 28, 2026 $8.3bn $23.9bn

BOND and EWJ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EWJ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BOND

BOND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

EWJ

EWJ tracks the MSCI Japan. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 169 positions, with the top ten at 29.5%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or EWJ?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −1.4% and EWJ +18.1%.
Which is cheaper, BOND or EWJ?
EWJ is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BOND against EWJ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-ewj

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.