Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BOND vs VPL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOND returned −1.4% to VPL's +24.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BOND and VPL

Net assets: $8.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund, and $9.0bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
BOND total return, 1 year
+24.8%
VPL total return, 1 year
0.54%
BOND expense ratio
0.07%
VPL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VPL costs 0.47 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 26.2 points.

BOND vs VPL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDVPL
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+24.8%
Drawdown
Below its high3.1%, high on Feb 27, 20267.2%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedFTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.54%0.07%
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and VPL as of Sep 30, 2026$8.3bn$9.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund24.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and VPL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BOND VPL
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BOND
UMBS, TBA 5.56%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund 4.07%
UMBS, TBA 3.46%
United States Treasury 3.40%
UMBS, TBA 2.73%
United States Treasury 2.57%
UMBS, TBA 2.54%
UMBS, TBA 2.27%
Only in VPL
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 7.11%
SK hynix Inc 5.82%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc 1.98%
BHP Group Ltd 1.69%
SLBBH1142 1.57%
Toyota Motor Corp 1.51%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia 1.37%
Tokyo Electron Ltd 1.30%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Pacific Stock
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +24.8%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) not measured
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs AGG not measured
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.07%
Holdings 1565 2343
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and VPL as of Sep 30, 2026 $8.3bn $9.0bn

BOND and VPL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BOND

BOND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VPL

VPL tracks an index of Pacific Stock. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,343 positions, with the top ten at 24.8%. It sat 7.2% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or VPL?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −1.4% and VPL +24.8%.
Which is cheaper, BOND or VPL?
VPL is cheaper, by 0.47 percentage points a year. That is about $47 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BOND against VPL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-vpl

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.