Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BOND vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOND returned −1.4% to PDBC's +55.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BOND and PDBC

Net assets: $8.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund, and $8.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
BOND total return, 1 year
+55.6%
PDBC total return, 1 year
0.54%
BOND expense ratio
0.59%
PDBC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

BOND costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 57.0 points.

BOND vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDPDBC
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+55.6%
Drawdown
Below its high3.1%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.54%0.59%
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026$8.3bn$8.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BOND PDBC
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BOND
UMBS, TBA 5.56%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund 4.07%
UMBS, TBA 3.46%
United States Treasury 3.40%
UMBS, TBA 2.73%
United States Treasury 2.57%
UMBS, TBA 2.54%
UMBS, TBA 2.27%
Only in PDBC
POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 19.37%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Commodity ETF
Issuer PIMCO Invesco
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +55.6%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) +54.6% (DBC)
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs AGG +1.0 pts vs DBC
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.59%
Holdings 1565 1
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026 $8.3bn $8.0bn

BOND and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

PDBC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BOND

BOND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

PDBC

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or PDBC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −1.4% and PDBC +55.6%.
Which is cheaper, BOND or PDBC?
BOND is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BOND against PDBC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-pdbc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.