Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BOND vs HGER: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOND returned −1.4% to HGER's +46.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BOND and HGER

Net assets: $8.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund, and $5.0bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
BOND total return, 1 year
+46.9%
HGER total return, 1 year
0.54%
BOND expense ratio
0.68%
HGER expense ratio

Pair scorecard

BOND costs 0.14 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 48.3 points.

BOND vs HGER: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDHGER
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+46.9%
Drawdown
Below its high3.1%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedQuantix Commodity Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.54%0.68%
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and HGER as of Oct 28, 2026$8.3bn$5.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and HGER hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BOND HGER
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BOND
UMBS, TBA 5.56%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund 4.07%
UMBS, TBA 3.46%
United States Treasury 3.40%
UMBS, TBA 2.73%
United States Treasury 2.57%
UMBS, TBA 2.54%
UMBS, TBA 2.27%
Only in HGER
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Commodity ETF
Issuer PIMCO Harbor
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +46.9%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) not measured
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs AGG not measured
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.68%
Holdings 1565 0
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and HGER as of Oct 28, 2026 $8.3bn $5.0bn

BOND and HGER on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

HGER flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BOND

BOND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

HGER

HGER tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +46.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.68% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 0 positions, with the top ten at not published.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or HGER?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −1.4% and HGER +46.9%.
Which is cheaper, BOND or HGER?
BOND is cheaper, by 0.14 percentage points a year. That is about $14 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BOND against HGER, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-hger

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.