Which returned more over the last year, BOND or BWET?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −0.1% and BWET returned +5129.6%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BOND or BWET?

BOND charges 0.54% a year and BWET charges 0.15%, so BWET is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BOND vs BWET: how they differ

BOND is a bond index fund and BWET a commodity fund, and over the year BWET returned more, +5129.6% against −0.1%.

PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF.

BOND and BWET on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund	BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	PIMCO	Breakwave
What it is	Active Bond Exchange-Traded	Tanker Shipping
Total return, 1 year	−0.1%	+5129.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−17.6 pts	+5112.1 pts
Expense ratio	0.54%	0.15%
Holdings	1565	not filed

BOND in plain words

BOND is a bond fund tracking the Active Bond Exchange-Traded. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

BWET in plain words

BWET is a commodity fund tracking the Tanker Shipping. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5129.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or BWET?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −0.1% and BWET returned +5129.6%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BOND or BWET?: BOND charges 0.54% a year and BWET charges 0.15%, so BWET is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BOND against BWET, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BOND against BWET, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-bwet Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources