Which returned more over the last year, BWET or IUSB?

In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5,121.7% and IUSB −1.2%.

Which is cheaper, BWET or IUSB?

IUSB is cheaper, by 4.62 percentage points a year. That is about $462 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Across categories

BWET vs IUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

BWET is a commodity futures fund and IUSB a bond index fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BWET returned +5,121.7% against −1.2%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BWET and IUSB

Net assets: $178m on Oct 28, 2026 for Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF, and $49.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF.

BWET on its own →IUSB on its own →

At a glance

+5,121.7%

BWET total return, 1 year

−1.2%

IUSB total return, 1 year

4.68%

BWET expense ratio

0.06%

IUSB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IUSB costs 4.62 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5122.9 points; IUSB is far larger, $49.8bn against $186m.

BWET vs IUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	BWET	IUSB
Return
Measure	BWET	IUSB
Total return, 1 year	+5,121.7%	−1.2%
Drawdown
Measure	BWET	IUSB
Below its high	11.2%, high on Oct 8, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	BWET	IUSB
What it tracks	Tanker freight futures	Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index
Cost and size
Measure	BWET	IUSB
Expense ratio	4.68%	0.06%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026	$186m	$49.8bn
Holdings
Measure	BWET	IUSB
Holdings in common	not published

Method

Side by side

BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF

Where it sits Commodity ETF Bond ETF

Issuer Breakwave iShares

What it is Holds tanker freight futures Tracks an index of Universal USD Bond

Total return, 1 year +5,121.7% −1.2%

Expense ratio 4.68% 0.06%

Holdings not counted 18338

Net assets, BWET as of Oct 28, 2026 and IUSB as of Oct 27, 2026 $178m $49.8bn

BWET and IUSB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

BWET

Its expense ratio is 4.68%, for the year to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-K states.

BWET holds tanker freight futures. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5,121.7% with distributions reinvested. It sat 11.2% below its high of Oct 8, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IUSB

IUSB tracks an index of Universal USD Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BWET or IUSB?: In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5,121.7% and IUSB −1.2%.
Which is cheaper, BWET or IUSB?: IUSB is cheaper, by 4.62 percentage points a year. That is about $462 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Other comparisons

BOND vs BWET BWET vs JAAA BWET vs IGSB BWET vs SGOV IUSB vs USO IUSB vs SIVR IUSB vs SLV GLDM vs IUSB

Where to next

BWET on its own →IUSB on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →IUSB dividend history →IUSB holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

Breakwave page for BWET ↗

IUSB filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

IUSB prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iShares page for IUSB ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BWET against IUSB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-iusb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.