Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BOND vs FBCG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOND returned −1.4% to FBCG's +9.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BOND and FBCG

Net assets: $8.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund, and $7.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
BOND total return, 1 year
+9.5%
FBCG total return, 1 year
0.54%
BOND expense ratio
0.57%
FBCG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

BOND costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.9 points.

BOND vs FBCG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDFBCG
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+9.5%
Drawdown
Below its high3.1%, high on Feb 27, 20265.7%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.54%0.57%
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and FBCG as of Sep 30, 2026$8.3bn$7.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight85%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and FBCG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BOND FBCG
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BOND
UMBS, TBA 5.56%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund 4.07%
UMBS, TBA 3.46%
United States Treasury 3.40%
UMBS, TBA 2.73%
United States Treasury 2.57%
UMBS, TBA 2.54%
UMBS, TBA 2.27%
Only in FBCG
NVIDIA CORP 14.90%
APPLE INC 9.31%
ALPHABET INC 9.27%
AMAZON.COM INC 5.86%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.94%
BROADCOM INC 4.38%
ELI LILLY and CO 2.71%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.31%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +9.5%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) +13.7% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs AGG −4.2 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.57%
Holdings 1565 230
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and FBCG as of Sep 30, 2026 $8.3bn $7.6bn

BOND and FBCG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BOND

BOND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

FBCG

FBCG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 230 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or FBCG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −1.4% and FBCG +9.5%.
Which is cheaper, BOND or FBCG?
BOND is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BOND against FBCG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-fbcg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.