Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BOND vs XOVR: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOND returned −1.4% to XOVR's −3.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BOND and XOVR

Net assets on Jun 30, 2026: $8.3bn for PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund and $2.2bn for ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
BOND total return, 1 year
−3.0%
XOVR total return, 1 year
0.54%
BOND expense ratio
1.81%
XOVR expense ratio

Pair scorecard

BOND costs 1.27 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.6 points; BOND is 3.8 times larger.

BOND vs XOVR: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDXOVR
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%−3.0%
Drawdown
Below its high3.1%, high on Feb 27, 20266.5%, high on Oct 5, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.54%1.81%
Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026$8.3bn$2.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight43%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund63.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and XOVR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BOND XOVR
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BOND
UMBS, TBA 5.56%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund 4.07%
UMBS, TBA 3.46%
United States Treasury 3.40%
UMBS, TBA 2.73%
United States Treasury 2.57%
UMBS, TBA 2.54%
UMBS, TBA 2.27%
Only in XOVR
N/A 17.73%
Nvidia Corp 9.47%
Astera Labs Inc 7.75%
Alphabet Inc 6.52%
Meta Platforms Inc 4.47%
Applovin Corp 3.95%
Natera Inc 3.70%
Robinhood Markets Inc 3.55%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
Issuer PIMCO ERShares
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year −1.4% −3.0%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) not measured
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs AGG not measured
Expense ratio 0.54% 1.81%
Holdings 1565 32
Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026 $8.3bn $2.2bn

BOND and XOVR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BOND

BOND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XOVR

XOVR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −3.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 1.81% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 32 positions, with the top ten at 63.1%. It sat 6.5% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or XOVR?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −1.4% and XOVR −3.0%.
Which is cheaper, BOND or XOVR?
BOND is cheaper, by 1.27 percentage points a year. That is about $127 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BOND against XOVR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-xovr

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.