Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FBCG vs IUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FBCG returned +9.5% to IUSB's −1.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FBCG and IUSB

Net assets: $7.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF, and $49.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF.

At a glance
+9.5%
FBCG total return, 1 year
−1.2%
IUSB total return, 1 year
0.57%
FBCG expense ratio
0.06%
IUSB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IUSB costs 0.51 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.7 points; IUSB is 6.3 times larger.

FBCG vs IUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFBCGIUSB
Return
Total return, 1 year+9.5%−1.2%
Drawdown
Below its high5.7%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedBloomberg U.S. Universal Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.57%0.06%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$7.6bn$48.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight85%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and IUSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FBCG IUSB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FBCG
NVIDIA CORP 14.90%
APPLE INC 9.31%
ALPHABET INC 9.27%
AMAZON.COM INC 5.86%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.94%
BROADCOM INC 4.38%
ELI LILLY and CO 2.71%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.31%
Only in IUSB
BLK Liquidity Temp Cash Inst #21 4.75%
TREASURY NOTE 0.49%
TREASURY NOTE 0.42%
TREASURY NOTE 0.41%
TREASURY NOTE 0.38%
TREASURY NOTE 0.37%
TREASURY NOTE (2OLD) 0.36%
UMBS 15YR TBA(REG B) 0.35%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Universal USD Bond
Total return, 1 year +9.5% −1.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −4.2 pts vs VOO not measured
Expense ratio 0.57% 0.06%
Holdings 230 18338
Net assets, FBCG as of Sep 30, 2026 and IUSB as of Oct 27, 2026 $7.6bn $49.8bn

FBCG and IUSB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IUSB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FBCG

FBCG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 230 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IUSB

IUSB tracks an index of Universal USD Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or IUSB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +9.5% and IUSB −1.2%.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or IUSB?
IUSB is cheaper, by 0.51 percentage points a year. That is about $51 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FBCG against IUSB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-iusb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.