Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BOND vs COWZ: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOND returned −1.4% to COWZ's +24.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BOND and COWZ

Net assets: $8.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund, and $19.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
BOND total return, 1 year
+24.4%
COWZ total return, 1 year
0.54%
BOND expense ratio
0.49%
COWZ expense ratio

Pair scorecard

COWZ costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 25.8 points.

BOND vs COWZ: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDCOWZ
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+24.4%
Drawdown
Below its high3.1%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedPacer US Cash Cows 100 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.54%0.49%
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and COWZ as of Oct 27, 2026$8.3bn$19.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight95%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund20.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and COWZ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BOND COWZ
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BOND
UMBS, TBA 5.56%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund 4.07%
UMBS, TBA 3.46%
United States Treasury 3.40%
UMBS, TBA 2.73%
United States Treasury 2.57%
UMBS, TBA 2.54%
UMBS, TBA 2.27%
Only in COWZ
Booking Holdings Inc 2.23%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.18%
HCA Healthcare Inc 2.07%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 2.06%
General Dynamics Corp 2.05%
Intuit Inc 2.04%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.97%
AT&T Inc 1.95%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
Issuer PIMCO Pacer
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +24.4%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) not measured
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs AGG not measured
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.49%
Holdings 1565 100
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and COWZ as of Oct 27, 2026 $8.3bn $19.5bn

BOND and COWZ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

COWZ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BOND

BOND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

COWZ

COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or COWZ?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −1.4% and COWZ +24.4%.
Which is cheaper, BOND or COWZ?
COWZ is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BOND against COWZ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-cowz

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.