Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

COWZ vs VGLT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, COWZ returned +24.4% to VGLT's −6.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about COWZ and VGLT

Net assets: $19.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF, and $10.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF.

At a glance
+24.4%
COWZ total return, 1 year
−6.7%
VGLT total return, 1 year
0.49%
COWZ expense ratio
0.03%
VGLT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VGLT costs 0.46 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 31.1 points.

COWZ vs VGLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCOWZVGLT
Return
Total return, 1 year+24.4%−6.7%
Drawdown
Below its high38.8%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Benchmark
What it tracksPacer US Cash Cows 100 IndexBloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.49%0.03%
Net assets, COWZ as of Oct 27, 2026 and VGLT as of Sep 30, 2026$19.5bn$10.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight95%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund20.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and VGLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first COWZ VGLT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in COWZ
Booking Holdings Inc 2.23%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.18%
HCA Healthcare Inc 2.07%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 2.06%
General Dynamics Corp 2.05%
Intuit Inc 2.04%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.97%
AT&T Inc 1.95%
Only in VGLT
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.19%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.13%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.13%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.10%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.08%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.08%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.07%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.05%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF VGLT Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100 Tracks an index of Long-term Treasury
Total return, 1 year +24.4% −6.7%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured −6.7% (SCHQ)
Gap to its benchmark not measured 0.0 pts vs SCHQ
Expense ratio 0.49% 0.03%
Holdings 100 102
Net assets, COWZ as of Oct 27, 2026 and VGLT as of Sep 30, 2026 $19.5bn $10.4bn

COWZ and VGLT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

COWZ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
COWZ

COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.

VGLT

VGLT tracks an index of Long-term Treasury. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −6.7% with distributions reinvested, against −6.7% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 38.8% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or VGLT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +24.4% and VGLT −6.7%.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or VGLT?
VGLT is cheaper, by 0.46 percentage points a year. That is about $46 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, COWZ against VGLT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-vglt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.