Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

COWZ vs VCLT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, COWZ returned +24.4% to VCLT's −5.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about COWZ and VCLT

Net assets: $19.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF, and $7.5bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF.

At a glance
+24.4%
COWZ total return, 1 year
−5.9%
VCLT total return, 1 year
0.49%
COWZ expense ratio
0.03%
VCLT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VCLT costs 0.46 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 30.3 points.

COWZ vs VCLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCOWZVCLT
Return
Total return, 1 year+24.4%−5.9%
Drawdown
Below its high17.8%, high on Sep 22, 2021
Benchmark
What it tracksPacer US Cash Cows 100 IndexBloomberg U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Bond Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.49%0.03%
Net assets, COWZ as of Oct 27, 2026 and VCLT as of Sep 30, 2026$19.5bn$7.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight95%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund20.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and VCLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first COWZ VCLT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in COWZ
Booking Holdings Inc 2.23%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.18%
HCA Healthcare Inc 2.07%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 2.06%
General Dynamics Corp 2.05%
Intuit Inc 2.04%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.97%
AT&T Inc 1.95%
Only in VCLT
MKTLIQ 1.03%
Anheuser-Busch Cos LLC / Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide Inc 0.37%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.36%
CVS Health Corp 0.33%
Boeing Co 0.27%
Meta Platforms Inc 0.27%
AT&T Inc 0.24%
AT&T Inc 0.24%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100 Tracks an index of Long-Term Corporate Bond
Total return, 1 year +24.4% −5.9%
Expense ratio 0.49% 0.03%
Holdings 100 2562
Net assets, COWZ as of Oct 27, 2026 and VCLT as of Sep 30, 2026 $19.5bn $7.5bn

COWZ and VCLT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

COWZ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
COWZ

COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.

VCLT

VCLT tracks an index of Long-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −5.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 17.8% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or VCLT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +24.4% and VCLT −5.9%.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or VCLT?
VCLT is cheaper, by 0.46 percentage points a year. That is about $46 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, COWZ against VCLT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-vclt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.